<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">ECW Users</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/atom/" />
    <updated></updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2021</rights>
    <generator uri="http://expressionengine.com/" version="1.7.1">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:ecwusers.com,2021:09:08</id>


    <entry>
      <title>HIE 5 saves the day but does p2p count&#63;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/27342/" />      
      <id>tag:ecwusers.com,2021:index.php/forums/viewthread/.27342</id>
      <published>2021-09-07T15:21:45Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>doctorlacs</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>Hi everyone,</p>

<p>The HIE 5 is a new alternative measure that was released for 2021 that will allow us to skip or replace both HIE 1 and 4 to export data to a referral provider and import data from a referring provider.&nbsp; However what can we use to meet this measure?&nbsp; Has to be a bi-directional HIE that can pull in discharge summaries and incorporate into our progress notes.&nbsp; This may be to comply with the new PEN notifications.&nbsp;  Sounds like the p2p network should work, but eCW says that they do not have a solution.&nbsp; Is anyone else trying to meet this measure?</p>

<p>TIA <br />
Lacs
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>MIPS for providers</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/26795/" />      
      <id>tag:ecwusers.com,2021:index.php/forums/viewthread/.26795</id>
      <published>2021-01-18T12:40:28Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>Cheljo001</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>Does anyone know of the best way to make MIPS easier for providers? For example, for tobacco screening/counseling, do we have to click into preventive med&#8212;&gt; counseling&#8212;&gt; tobacco&#8212;&gt; counseled on &#8220;m/d/y&#8221; or is there a way to utilize CPT codes associated with templates instead? I was finding some information on the my.eclinicalworks website, but I want to be sure we are doing this correctly.
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>MIPS Dashboard &#45; HIE 4 Incoming referral</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/25799/" />      
      <id>tag:ecwusers.com,2019:index.php/forums/viewthread/.25799</id>
      <published>2019-07-05T09:10:52Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>resh</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>Has anyone been able to get data in the numerator or denominator for this measure? We have incoming referrals and I&#8217;ve followed eCW&#8217;s 2019 PI User guide exactly. Transition of care button, verify RX&#8230;.etc&#8230;.. still goose eggs for all of our providers. Thanks!
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>2018 MIPS Dashboard score</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/25570/" />      
      <id>tag:ecwusers.com,2019:index.php/forums/viewthread/.25570</id>
      <published>2019-03-28T05:22:17Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>Rlore</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>Anyone notice a difference between the scoring listed on the MIPS dashboard (which wasn’t fully working until end of December to begin with) and the scoring of the MIPS Submission dashboard?&nbsp; Started the MIPS reporting process with our ECW representative, and when they packaged up the data and did m-vaal, the final dashboard scoring looks significantly different for all our providers.
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>What exactly qualifies as Obj 8&#45;2 Patient Electronic Access VDT for MU Stage 2</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/25308/" />      
      <id>tag:ecwusers.com,2018:index.php/forums/viewthread/.25308</id>
      <published>2018-12-11T08:37:36Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>notsosuperman</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>I&#8217;m at one of our dental only sites, and the portal really has limited use for dental patients. Now that we have to worry about Stage 2, the Patient Electronic Access (VDT) is ending up being very difficult to meet. Plus, I&#8217;m getting mixed signals as to what exactly puts a patient in the numerator. So a few questions since I know there&#8217;s some great resources on this forum.</p>

<p>- What does a patient actually have to do on the portal to be considered VDT (can you break it down in terms of what areas they would need to click on)? </p>

<p>- I&#8217;ve been told that using the Healow app does NOT count, and that the portal must be accessed through the website, with no explanation on why this would be the case. This sounds really odd. Any truth to this?</p>

<p>- While we are at it, what constitutes Obj 9 Secure Electronic Messaging? I try to send patients messages through the telephone encounter &#8220;Reply to patient&#8221; button, but this doesn&#8217;t seem to be counting. When I am composing a message to a patient, there is a checkbox about &#8220;Follow up care&#8221; or something. What is that box all about? Also, do patients actually get a notification that they have a message? I tried testing it with a staff member, and she didn&#8217;t get any notification that I had messaged her back. </p>

<p>Thanks!
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Full Screen view &#45; MIPS</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/25260/" />      
      <id>tag:ecwusers.com,2018:index.php/forums/viewthread/.25260</id>
      <published>2018-11-15T16:41:16Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>fjonesak</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>This is probably already known by most users <b>but</b> just in case it isn&#8217;t!</p>

<p>In 10e, from Report Console, right click on MIPS, click Open Link in New Chrome Tab. It opens a full-screen view of the MIPS dashboard!&nbsp; </p>

<p>Doesn&#8217;t take much to blow my mind&#8230;&nbsp; <img src="http://www.ecwusers.com/images/smileys/wink.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="wink" style="border:0;" />
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>patient electronic access eCW workflow required</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/24987/" />      
      <id>tag:ecwusers.com,2018:index.php/forums/viewthread/.24987</id>
      <published>2018-06-26T10:12:14Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>tphilips80</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>Hi all <br />
I am curious what other peoples thoughts are on an eCW requirement to meet the patient electronic access MU measurement. <br />
Despite the fact that the patient hub has the ability to record and email and or that a patient refuses to provide one eCW as of Nov 2017 eCW indicates that this information must be entered in the appointment check in process. Further this also applies to if a patient is or is not web enabled, which again is in the patient hub. </p>

<p>The document is on myeclinicalworks under mu documentation, titled MU Modified Stage 2 for EPs Demonstrating Stage 2 from 2015</p>

<p>Area to Document within eCW</p>

<p>Appointment window &gt; W check box <br />
Appointment window &gt; set visit status to arrived &gt; enter their email address in the email field or check the don&#8217;t web enable box and select a reason from the reason drop-down list.</p>

<p>I asked my SAM what specific table / field is being referenced in the MAQ dashboard for this measure and they noted a &#8220;separate appointment table&#8221; that is used to capture a timestamp but would not provide detail. I have looked in the enc table and do not see this info. </p>

<p>My concern is that we are an interfaced environment pm / ehr and do not follow this workflow but today we still have data in the MAQ dashboard. Additional I am concerned for any customers using the ecw kiosk for check in as theoretically this work flow would not be possible to complete. </p>

<p>thoughts?
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Specialized Registry reporting question</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/24815/" />      
      <id>tag:ecwusers.com,2018:index.php/forums/viewthread/.24815</id>
      <published>2018-03-27T11:47:02Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>lherndon</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>Does anyone have experience with either CDC NCHS or Dartnet for the purpose of meeting the ACI_TRANS_PHCDRR_3 <b>specialized registry reporting</b> measure? Your opinions would be greatly appreciated.&nbsp; <img src="http://www.ecwusers.com/images/smileys/shade_grin.gif" width="19" height="19" alt="cool grin" style="border:0;" />
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>Not sure what this means for q1 2018 MU Reporting</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/24802/" />      
      <id>tag:ecwusers.com,2018:index.php/forums/viewthread/.24802</id>
      <published>2018-03-20T19:24:45Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>tphilips80</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>New eCW notification posted <br />
406487-eCW_-_Allergy_Section_in_CCDA_for_Practices_Using_Medi-Span_or_Multum_Databases_-_Mar_2018.pdf
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>

    <entry>
      <title>MU 2015 Certification &#63;&#63;&#63;&#63;</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php/forums/viewthread/24642/" />      
      <id>tag:ecwusers.com,2018:index.php/forums/viewthread/.24642</id>
      <published>2018-01-09T14:11:44Z</published>
      <updated></updated>
      <author><name>tphilips80</name></author>
      <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
        <p>Hi all <br />
Is anyone else concerned that we are losing a 90 day reporting period for 2018 MU because eCW hasn&#8217;t released a 2015 certified version yet?</p>

<p>Starting in 2018, all providers who see Medicare and Medicaid patients must meet certain requirements in order to (a) receive Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive payment; and (b) avoid downward payment adjustments under the Medicare EHR Incentive Program.</p>

<p>Providers who only see Medicaid patients and thereby only participate in the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program are not subject to the Medicare downward payment adjustments.&nbsp; </p>

<p>The Stage 3 requirements were optional in 2017, but are now required for all participants beginning in 2018.&nbsp; </p>

<p>The goal of Stage 3 is to move all participants in the Medicare program and all those in the Medicaid program into one single set of requirements</p>

<p>There are 8 objectives for providers:&nbsp; <a href="http://www.ecwusers.com/index.php?URL=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cms.gov%2FRegulations-and-Guidance%2FLegislation%2FEHRIncentivePrograms%2FDownloads%2FTableofContents_EP_Medicaid_Stage3.pdf">https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/TableofContents_EP_Medicaid_Stage3.pdf</a></p>

<p>The objectives and measures that will be required will be standardized starting in 2018 – regardless of prior participation in either the Medicare or the Medicaid programs</p>

<p>Stage 3 requires that all providers use technology certified to the 2015 edition.&nbsp; In some instances technology that is a mix of 2015 and 2014 certifications may meet Stage 3 requirements.
</p>
      ]]>
      </content>
    </entry>


</feed>